Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
threads (as specified by the option). But, it doesn't make sense to have more threads than number of CPUs available. It works good if the thread count is same as number of CPUs you have in server.
With 2 CPU ==> 2 threads. If the server receives 2 request for data not in its disc cache the 2 threads will be blocked by the disc access. And if a third request asks for data that is in the server cache it will not answer even if it can do it quickly. Am I wrong ? With NFS servers, it seems to me that it was recommended to have 4 threads per processor. Thierry. -- Thierry.EXCOFFIER@@liris.univ-lyon1.fr// GO: Oriental Strategy Game LIRIS/UFR Informatique, bat710 //DYLAN: Programming Language Universite Claude Bernard LYON 1 __// UNIX: Standard Operating System 43 Bd du 11 novembre 1918 // 69622 VILLEURBANNE, FRANCE //WWW: http://www710.univ-lyon1.fr/~exco
