So what is the purpose of the storage-home volume? It doesn't appear to
be referenced anywhere.
And are you saying that it is possible to connect via a protocol/client
volume to a remote volume of type other than protocol/server?
Gordan
Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
You will not connect to the server protocol volume, instead you connect
to one of its subvolumes (depending on the auth.....allow). Hence, what
i wrote is valid.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
Well, I would say that won't work.
http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/AFR_single_process
Check the above link. It should works fine. This can extended
further to unify with NUFA (afr with the local posix volume as
local-volume-name).
Thanks for that. I'm not 100% sure, but shouldn't this:
volume home[12]
type protocol/client
option transport-type tcp/client
option remote-host machine0[12]
option remote-subvolume home2
end-volume
instead be:
volume home[12]
type protocol/client
option transport-type tcp/client
option remote-host machine0[12]
option remote-subvolume storage-home
end-volume
?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Amar Tumballi
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org <http://irc.gnu.org>]
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage!
