On Tue, 6 May 2008, Krishna Srinivas wrote:
If server-side AFR breaks with fail-over, is it possible to use server-side
AFR on some nodes and client-side AFR on others, with the client side AFR
nodes talking directly to the same storage bricks that the server side AFR
is unifying for server-side AFR nodes?
Or would this break things?
It will not break things as long as the afr's subvol listing order are same.
Is this an issue in server-side-only AFR? I have two servers which are
also clients of themselves, and they both list their local subvolume
first and remote subvolume second. Is this a problem? What are the
possible consequences of this?
Gordan
