Re: Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Brandon Lamb <brandonlamb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ok I got it all up
>
>
> http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Setting_up_AFR_on_two_servers_with_pre-existing_data
>
> Does it all look right?
>
> Krishna replied with the suggestion of removing file attributes, any
> preference between that or setting the version to a lower value? I
> guess the end result is the same, but is one more "proper"?
>
> One of GlusterFS's main motto, "keep it simple", that way, what Krishna
suggested should be much proper.


-- 
Amar Tumballi
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage!


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux