Could someone publish a example server-side afr setup (perhaps on the wiki) just to see how the server and client vols hang together. Amar S. Tumballi wrote: >>> Would doing server >>> side afr be faster for this process? >>> >> Server will still have to replicate so there should not be any difference. >> >> > > > >>> Or just go with the data having to be copied over the network twice >>> (if this is how it works) >>> >> I could not understand this... >> >> > > > Krishna, my understanding is, Brandon is referring to server side afr, > where you have one subvolume as posix, (ie, no network call), so data is not > transfered on the wire. so it can be faster right? > > Regards, > > -- Dr. Rodney G. McDuff |Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam Manager, Strategic Technologies Group| Ex luce ad tenebras Information Technology Services | The University of Queensland | EMAIL: mcduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | TELEPHONE: +61 7 3365 8220 |
