Re: Problems with unify

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oh! that mail escaped my notice. We can integrate this patch to mainline.
So, you need not worry about patching server every time.  Btw, please do
send me the patch you have for the latest GlusterFS (because, there is a lot
changed from 1.3.3 time).

About the version, yes, server and client needs to be of the same version
for now. (From 1.3.8+ any 1.3.x server can work with 1.3.x client)

Regards,
Amar

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Paul Arch <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> <snip>
>
> >fixed in the current '1.3.8pre5' release. Can you check with the latest
> pre release
> >
> >Regards,
> >Amar
>
> Just a quick question, when updating do you need to update both the client
> AND the server ?
>
> Main reason being I had to follow some patchs to get glusterfsd compiled
> under FreeBSD, it doesn't seem to be integrated into the tree and would be a
> pain having to patch each time
>
> ( we are testing glusterfsd on freebsd overlaying ZFS ) ( client is
> openSuSE )
>
> [http://www.mail-archive.com/gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx/msg02121.html]
>
> [ sorry to highjack it is just our setup will be simular hence we will
> need to upgrade also ]
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Antonio González <
> antonio.gonzalez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have made some test with the unify translator to check the
> > viability…The scenario is 4 machines, 2 storage servers, 1 server
> > witch creates the unify translator, and 1 client. If the server 1 goes
> > down and I "mkdir" in the client, when the server returns if I list
> > the directory in the client, the directory is created in the server,
> > but if I try to "cp" or "mv" a file/es directly over the directory
> > (without using the "tab" to list the
> > directory)
> > an inconsistency occurs. The directory will be not created at the
> > server and the client will not be able to read these files.
> >
> >
> >
> > In future releases, the self-heal of unify will be automatic??? I say,
> > When a server goes down and returns after, a process checks
> > automatically the consistency of namespace and child nodes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > Antonio.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Amar Tumballi
> Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
> [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
> http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Supercomputing and Superstorage!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Amar Tumballi
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Supercomputing and Superstorage!

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux