Re: ls again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

yes, i realised that. The thing is... as i said... nothing has changed, a part from gluster version. Disk were and still are ok. Just in case... i performed a whole fsck of each disk, but no error was reported.

is there any other explanation for that issue?

En/na Amar S. Tumballi ha escrit:
Hi Jordi,
 Can you check on the backend if your disks are ok? because from posix level
itself, you are getting EIO. (Input/Output Error)

Regards,
Amar

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Jordi Moles <jordi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi everyone,

i was about to write a new message to this list to explain my new
experiencies with "the ls problem".

This morning i updated both fuse and glusterfs to the latest tla versions,
i used to have mainline2.5-patch 690, now i've got patch 736.

The thing is that i used to have "ls slow" commands when there was "some"
activity in the filesystem.

But with today's update, the system is even slowler, with an empty
filesystem, with no activity at all.... ls is really really slow.

is that normal?

these are extracts from my log files:

postfix-client
***************
2008-04-07 16:09:52 E [unify.c:177:unify_lookup_cbk] ultim: grup1 returned
5
2008-04-07 16:09:52 E [fuse-bridge.c:459:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
483446: (34) /dummymassiu2/new/
1207584588.V12I1e6810M24355.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1312 => -1 (5)
2008-04-07 16:09:52 E [unify.c:177:unify_lookup_cbk] ultim: grup1 returned
5
2008-04-07 16:09:52 E [fuse-bridge.c:459:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
483450: (34) /dummymassiu2/new/
1207584588.V12I1e6810M24355.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1312 => -1 (5)
2008-04-07 16:09:53 E [unify.c:177:unify_lookup_cbk] ultim: grup1 returned
5
2008-04-07 16:09:53 E [fuse-bridge.c:459:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
483784: (34) /dummymassiu6/new/
1207584588.V12I124a4aM313591.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1313 => -1 (5)
2008-04-07 16:09:53 E [unify.c:177:unify_lookup_cbk] ultim: grup1 returned
5
2008-04-07 16:09:53 E [fuse-bridge.c:459:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
483788: (34) /dummymassiu6/new/
1207584588.V12I124a4aM313591.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1313 => -1 (5)
***************

nodes
***************
2008-04-07 16:10:29 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu6/new/maildirsize: Input/output error
2008-04-07 16:10:29 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu6/new/
1207584613.V12I124a4aM742789.postfix01gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1312:
Input/output error
2008-04-07 16:10:29 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu6/new/maildirsize: Input/output error
2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu2/new/
1207584622.V12I1e6810M709269.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1310:
Input/output error
2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu2/new/
1207584622.V12I1e6810M709269.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1310:
Input/output error
2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu6/new/
1207584610.V12I124a51M867739.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1310:
Input/output error
2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu6/new/maildirsize: Input/output error
2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu6/new/maildirsize: Input/output error
2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu6/new/
1207584616.V12I124a52M181177.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1311:
Input/output error
2008-04-07 16:10:30 W [posix.c:92:posix_lookup] esp: lstat on
/dummymassiu6/new/
1207584610.V12I124a51M867739.postfix02gluster01.cdmon.com,S=1310:
Input/output error
***************

Nothing a part from the glusterfs version has changed... i mean... conf
files are the same.... same machines.... and so on.....











En/na Reinis Rozitis ha escrit:

 ls commands on modern GNU/Linux systems run xattr calls on each entry for
ACL purposes. This can turn out to be pretty expensive in terms of
performance.

Thanks,
thats what I thought of. Maybe worth to add to the FAQ or some other
docs so
it doesnt turn out as WTF - factor.

rr



_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel









[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux