> > > Cool. In the case of mixed results (some success, some > failures), what is the result? Anyway to distinguish > this from a complete success? any one success is considered transactions success. fixing the failed operations is part of next open() (self-heal). Any plans for such a feature? HA is great, but so is > error resilience/correction. :) we have thoughs of checksum based error detection/correction. Infact one of the users has submitted a n ECC based translator (yet to be reviewed seriously). But no plans of making it part of AFR. We are infact even thinking of raid5 or raid6 kind of translator which does checksum based error detection/recover to some extent. Thanks for the quick responses! usually they have higher latency :) avati
