After you unmount, is the cpu consuption going up? avati 2008/2/29, Mickey Mazarick <mic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > It's noting that complicated... > one mount one process that sticks around. I am using ib-verbs btw. > > [root@RTPST205 ~]# ps -ef |grep > gluster > root 14423 13814 0 15:14 pts/1 00:00:00 grep gluster > [root@RTPST205 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/glusterfs -l > > /var/glustersystemclient.log -f /etc/glusterfs-system.vol -d disable > /system > > [root@RTPST205 ~]# ps -ef |grep gluster > root 10972 1 0 12:16 ? 00:00:01 > [glusterfs] > > root 14438 13814 0 15:16 pts/1 00:00:00 grep gluster > [root@RTPST205 ~]# umount /system > [root@RTPST205 ~]# ps -ef |grep gluster > root 10972 1 0 12:16 ? 00:00:02 > [glusterfs] > > root 14451 13814 0 15:17 pts/1 00:00:00 grep gluster > > > -Mic > > > Sascha Ottolski wrote: > > Am Freitag 29 Februar 2008 12:33:36 schrieb Anand Avati: > > > >> depends on whether you passed a mountpoint in the command line > >> argument. do you mean that the glusterfs client is still running > >> after you unmounted? or did you mean that before unmounting there > >> were two [glusterfs] and after unmounting there is just one (which > >> would be the server) ? > >> > > > > if I my add my 2 cents: as I reported in an earlier posting, it is > > possible to mount the same mount-point several times, which results in > > serveral glusterfs processes running. in such a case, you need to kill > > all of them or umount several times. > > > > of course, it would be best to prevent a second mount of a already > > mounted gluster share (someone posted a recipe on how one could to > > this; may this should be patched into the sources?). > > > > > > Cheers, Sascha > > > > > > > >> avati > >> > > > > > >> 2008/2/29, Mickey Mazarick <mic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > >>> Ah I see! I have an additional comment/question though. > >>> > >>> I've noticed that when I unmount a gluster volume on a client the > >>> [glusterfs] process is still running. Perhaps it thinks my cleint > >>> spec is a server. > >>> I have no instance of "type protocol/server" in the client spec. > >>> What does it use to determine weather it's a client or a server? > >>> > >>> -Mickey Mazarick > >>> > >>> Anand Avati wrote: > >>> > >>>> Mickey, > >>>> in the latest codebase, there are no more server and client > >>>> programs. there is just one glusterfs (and glusterfsd is a > >>>> symlink to glusterfs). it behaves either as a client or server > >>>> according to the volume spec file given. > >>>> > >>>> if the glusterfs program is passed a mountpoint it attaches a > >>>> fuse translator in a hardcoded way, so this preserves backward > >>>> compatibility. The new model also allows both protocol/server and > >>>> mount/fuse (mountability) in the same spec file which can be a > >>>> performance improvement in NUFA mode of operations. > >>>> > >>>> avati > >>>> > >>>> 2008/2/29, Mickey Mazarick <mic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> > >>>> <mailto:mic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> This is very minor but it did break a kill script I wrote. > >>>> > >>>> When I run the latest build, the server daemon shows up as: > >>>> [glusterfs] > >>>> in the process list. > >>>> > >>>> Just an FYI :-) > >>>> Thanks! > >>>> -Mickey Mazarick > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list > >>>> > >>>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> If I traveled to the end of the rainbow > >>>> As Dame Fortune did intend, > >>>> Murphy would be there to tell me > >>>> The pot's at the other end. > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- If I traveled to the end of the rainbow As Dame Fortune did intend, Murphy would be there to tell me The pot's at the other end.
