Re; Bug #21918

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gluster-devel Glister Devel List <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re; Bug #21918
From: Gareth Bult <gareth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:24:51 +0000 (GMT)

Hi, 

There's one issue that's stopping me going production atm, which is documented in #21918. 

Any news on this .. it does seem fairly "critical" to Gluster being usable ... ??? 

tia 
Gareth.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re; Bug #21918
  - From: Anand Avati

Prev by Date: Best configuration for a simple redundant 2 server glusterfs volume?
Next by Date: Re: Best configuration for a simple redundant 2 server glusterfs volume?
Previous by thread: Best configuration for a simple redundant 2 server glusterfs volume?
Next by thread: Re: Re; Bug #21918
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Users] [Ceph Users] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux