On Jan 17, 2008 11:35 PM, Sascha Ottolski <ottolski@xxxxxx> wrote: > Am Freitag 18 Januar 2008 04:00:06 schrieb Anand Avati: > > Brandon, > > which is the fuse kernel module version you are using? please with > > the fuse kernel module from - > > > > http://ftp.zresearch.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/fuse/old/fuse-2.7.0.ta > >r.gz > > wouldn't you recommend 2.7.0-glfs7, then? > > > > we have been seeing some perf issues with small files while > > write-behind is on. can you try with an untar of large files, with > > write-behind on? > > interesting, i didn't investigate it thorougly engough, but my > impression so far was, that write-behind as well as read-ahead doesn't > make much of a difference for very small files, neither good nor bad. > > > Cheers, Sascha > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > Just wanted to note, I downgraded fuse and ran the cp and tar test and it shaved 2-3 seconds off both tests. Havent had a chance to tar up some large files yet
