Li,
this is legacy code from the time when the inode framework was not around,
and multiple fds and plain calls on filenames could not be related. back
then the aggregate-size was used as a mean to aggregate only broken writes
of fuse. I guess we can remove this piece of code now though it actually
causes no "harm".
avati
2007/12/19, LI Daobing <lidaobing@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hello,
>
> a code in write-behind.c, function wb_writev:
> // begin
> if ((file->size >= conf->aggregate_size) ||
> (iov_length (vector, count) % 4096)) {
> wb_sync (wb_frame, file);
> }
> // end
>
> Why we don't cache(or aggregate) data, if the length of the data can
> not be divided by 4096?
>
> Any reason for this decision?
>
> Thanks,
> LI Daobing
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
--
If I traveled to the end of the rainbow
As Dame Fortune did intend,
Murphy would be there to tell me
The pot's at the other end.
