On Jan 7, 2008 8:41 PM, matthew zeier <mrz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Anand Avati wrote: > > Brandon, > > who does the copy is decided where the AFR translator is loaded. if you > > have AFR loaded on the client side, then the client does the two writes. you > > can also have AFR loaded on the server side, and handle server do the > > replication. Translators can be loaded anywhere (client or server, anywhere > > in the graph). You need to think more on the lines on how you can 'program > > glusterfs' rather than how to 'configure glusterfs'. > > Performance-wise, which is better? Or does it make sense one way vs. > the other based on number of clients? Im working on trying to figure out how to do this right now, stumbling my way through a server config. Using NFS my 2 servers sit at under 0.40 load most of the time, I would rather add extra load to them than my client machines.
