Am Montag 07 Januar 2008 17:39:15 schrieben Sie: > Sascha, > these patches are still not final (self heal enhancements are on the way) > but, as-is they should be stable. thanks, but I think there is a problem :-( just gave'em a whirl, but the client would segfault on first acces of the mount point: --------- got signal (11), printing backtrace --------- /lib/libc.so.6[0x2b15ff9f9110] /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so[0x2aaaaaab2dec] /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/afr.so(afr_setdents+0x1b9) [0x2aaaaabc4499] /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/unify.so(unify_sh_ns_getdents_cbk+0x15b) [0x2aaaaace3d7b] /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/cluster/afr.so(afr_getdents_cbk+0x20b) [0x2aaaaabc4c4b] /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so[0x2aaaaaab0db3] /usr/lib/glusterfs/1.3.8/xlator/protocol/client.so(notify+0x8fc) [0x2aaaaaab196c] /usr/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(sys_epoll_iteration+0xbf)[0x2b15ff47c5df] /usr/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(poll_iteration+0x75)[0x2b15ff47ba75] glusterfs(main+0x39d)[0x40338d] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xda)[0x2b15ff9e64ca] glusterfs[0x402f5a] Let me know if I can help tracking it down. Cheers, Sascha > > avati > > 2008/1/7, Sascha Ottolski <ottolski@xxxxxx>: > > Hi, > > > > does anyone know if the patches 629 till 633 can be considered stable? > > they > > sound as if they could increase performance, is this the case? > > > > > > Thanks a lot, > > > > Sascha > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
