OK, then why don't you recompile FUSE with my patch? http://hydra.azilian.net/patches/fuse-2.7.2-glfs7.patch Marian On Thursday 03 January 2008 13:16:49 Gareth Bult wrote: > Hi, > > The real problem for me was 1.3.7 bounces like a rubber ball. (machine > lock-up under intensive write) > > (incidentally the versioning indicates the fuse patches are against 2.7.2 > as opposed to 2.7.0) (raw fuse-2.7.2 causes me problems) > > glfs7 / gluster TLA is stable for me, however there are one or two > *CRITICAL* bugs which you really need to be aware of if you're going to try > using it. The main issue being that all machines using AFR should use the > same node as a mount point otherwise things will break horribly in the > event of breakages / self-heals. (some people may not consider this > critical, however if you have heart problems I can assure you it is .. ;-) > ) > > See bug # 21918 (and you may want to be aware of 21917/16 if the system > seems like it's doing more IO than it should) > > Gareth. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Amar S. Tumballi" <amar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Sascha Ottolski" <ottolski@xxxxxx> > Cc: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2008 11:03:39 AM (GMT) Europe/London > Subject: Re: how about 1.3.8 and fuse-2.7.2-glfs7 ? > > Hi, > Yes, we, from the dev team, recommend latest tla as it has much more > features than 1.3.7 release, and has lot of bug fixes. We are in the > process of making 1.3.8, but little more coding is pending for that (which > we hope to finish within another week or so). So, your wait is going to be > over. > > About, glfs7 for fuse-2.7.2, its not in official repo yet. Should be > available with 1.3.8 tarball soon. > > Regards, > Amar > > On Jan 3, 2008 4:18 PM, Sascha Ottolski <ottolski@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've seen talks about patches for fuse-2.7.2, and it appears as if the > > current > > tla is much more recommended than 1.3.7. I think it would be nice if > > tarballs > > of this would be offered (and awesome if lmello could update the debian > > packages :-)) > > > > I would also volunteer to create the deb packages, although I'm pretty > > new to > > that business... > > > > > > Cheers, Sascha > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
