I think I'm gonna love GlusterFS. NUFA option for local volume in the Translator page shows one local volume option nufa.local-volume-name posix1 If the local server has 2 local volumes, is it okay to define them both under nufa.local-volume-name or should it be unique ? Also, is it better to define one io-threads translator for a defined unified volume or one io-threads translator per volume used by the unified volume ? Ionel -------- Message d'origine-------- De: anand.avati@xxxxxxxxx de la part de Anand Avati Date: ven. 14/12/2007 17:26 À: GARDAIS Ionel Cc: Onyx; gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx Objet : Re: RE : user question : multiple clients concurrent access Great to hear. > One more question : is it okay to run server and client on the same > machine ? Yes you can. I have 4 XRaids (8 FC controllers) to which I'm about to connect 4 cluster > nodes with dual FC and dual GbE. > The idea is to use GlusterFS with cluster/unify to provide a uniform > storage pool (with aggregated I/O speed) to these same 4 cluster nodes. You can have a look at the NUFA scheduler in this case. It might suit your needs better than the others. avati -- If I traveled to the end of the rainbow As Dame Fortune did intend, Murphy would be there to tell me The pot's at the other end.
