Re: Re: Multiple AFR instances on same storage bricks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam,

If all the clients connect to the same AFR on a server then it works fine.

If there are different AFRs that are accessing same posix/storage volumes
then there is a bug which is not handled (creating a file simultaneously
on two clients might return success on both the clients or locking from
two clients might return success on both the clients) this bug is being
fixed after which you can have multiple AFR instances, but if this bug
does not bother you then you can use multiple AFR instances.

Krishna

On Dec 11, 2007 8:35 AM, Sam Douglas <sam.douglas32@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [damn email interface... tab then space caused it to send early]
>
> volume brick1
>     type storage/posix
>     ...
> end-volume
>
> volume client1
>    type protocol/client
>    ...
> end-volume
>
> volume client2
>    ...
> end-volume
>
> volume afr
>     type cluster/afr
>     option replicate *:3
>     subvolumes brick1 client1 client2
> end-volume
>
> volume server
>     # Export the bricks
> end-volume
>
> --
>
> Would there be any issues with multiple different AFR instances
> working on the same storage volumes?
>
> -- Sam Douglas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux