Re: afr's ns-brick and posix-locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
>
> I've been a little bit out of GlusterFS lately but, what about the issue
> with inode numbers changing with the first server (in the AFR system) goes
> out making fuse crazy? How are things going with the distributed namespace
> cache? I had an idea about this, it is ugly but fixes the problem if it
> hasn't been fixed already.


Currently we use inode generation based workarounds. I'm intersted in the
idea :)


avati


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux