On Nov 17, 2007 2:24 AM, Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > patch 563 now uses "option read-node" and not "option read-schedule" > > We thought about "option read-node child1,child3" but this wont really > > be used in the sense that users would want to read either from local > > storage or all the children. But there might be a case where one of the > > sobvols might be a low end machine where we dont want to schedule > > reads. Still thinking if it is worth implementing this particular feature. > > > I think you should rename it to 'option read-subvolumes' just to be > consistant with the naming conventions. Done. changed to "option read-subvolume"
