>
> Performance is still way below NFS. I have turned on
> write-behind and read-ahead. And with fuse it's a little faster. but
> not significantly.
What is your IO pattern? what are the tests you are running? what is your
interconnect? NFS can provide really good re-read performance which you can
get out of glusterfs using io-cache on the client side.
Can we have a discussion on whether I'm heading in the right
> direction and what order things go in for the config files?
Can you paste your config files on pastebin and link it and also tell us the
kind of application/IOtests you are running?
thanks,
avati
--
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account
Hofstadter's Law.
-- Hofstadter's Law
