RE: glusterfs as root filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I was fetching a single file with wget. I tried this with small (a few kb)
and larger (several MB)  files and got the same results: a wget from local
disk took about .001 seconds and a wget to glusterfs took .14 seconds. Is
this a valid way to test?
 
Chris  

  _____  

From: anand.avati@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:anand.avati@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Anand Avati
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:29 AM
To: Christopher Hawkins
Cc: gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: glusterfs as root filesystem





Sort of. I did use that but I could never get it to actually cache anything.

My reads never got quicker than the first one, no matter many times I called
the same files... But specifically I've heard talk from people asking about
using local storage for caching, which is not supported under the io-cache 
translator. So I would use that if it became available, and if not, I'll
eventually have to figure out why io-cache isn't working.


On what files were you not getting the speedup? on executables? or others?
if one shot of activity was exceeding the default cache-size value (32M)
then you may have to tune your priority and cache-size parameters to get any
caching effect. 

avati
 

-- 
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account
Hofstadter's Law.

-- Hofstadter's Law 


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux