Hi Daniel, Yes, we have finalized on the design for that, but sadly we haven't started the work on it yet. As avati told all our resources are busy with stabilizing 1.3 branch :( will send out the design doc of unify once I am done with it. Regards, Amar On 10/31/07, Daniel van Ham Colchete <daniel.colchete@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Amar! > > What about that improved unify without the namespace cache? > > Best, > Daniel > > On Oct 31, 2007 1:24 PM, Amar S. Tumballi <amar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I just backported 'performance/booster', but its not added to tla.. was > > > > testing it. Should be there in another day in latest TLA. > > > > Regards, > > Amar > > > > 2007/10/30, Székelyi Szabolcs <cc@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I couldn't find any information about the status of new features > > in > > > > > GlusterFS 1.4 (aka mainline-2.6). Could you write a few words (not > > > > > more) > > > > > about this? Specifically I'm interested in: > > > > > > > > > > * afr load-balancing > > > > > * active self-heal > > > > > * brick hot-* > > > > > * hot-defrag > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > -- > > > > > cc > > > > -- Amar Tumballi Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org] http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Supercomputing and Superstorage!
