Harris, the latest TLA has some cleanups about removing redundant synchronization locks, which can possible affect small files. can you please confirm if the performance hit on small files is seen with patch-402 as well? thanks! avati 2007/8/1, Harris Landgarten <harrisl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > time cp -av /usr/share/zoneinfo /mnt/glusterfs/test > > Harris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anand Avati" <avati@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Harris Landgarten" <harrisl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2007 11:03:58 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York > Subject: Re: writebehind slowness > > Harris, > with what application did you benchmark these number? > > avati > > > 2007/8/1 , Harris Landgarten < harrisl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >: > > I am doing some very basic tests on 397. > > time cp -av /usr/share/zoneinfo /mnt/glusterfs/test > > with writebehind: 20s > > without writebehind: 12s > > Please check writebehind functionality. What test shows an improvement? > > > Harris > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > -- > Anand V. Avati > -- Anand V. Avati
