Dale, please update to patch-320+, it should be a great deal lighter on memory usage. thanks, avati 2007/7/7, Dale Dude <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Im using patch 283 and think there might still be an issue. On 2 boxes with same os (2.6.15), fuse (2.6.5) and glusterfs they maintain memory after an rsync. After hours of inactivity it hasnt gone down. Box1: 341megz (5tb of files but transfer maybe a couple megs) Box2: 800megz (2tb of files and transfers almost a gig) Dale Rhesa Rozendaal wrote: > I'd like to say that the memory leak in unify has been plugged in > patch-277. > Thanks, Amar and crew! > > My current "top", after several hours of non-stop usage: > > 6125 root 16 0 230m 157m 908 S 23 7.8 41:51.75 [glusterfs] > > It's been stable like that for a long time now. The current amount can > easily be explained by io-threads, read-ahead and write-behind caches. > > I'm moving on to tweaking for performance, as glusterfs is now stable > enough for me to use it in production. > > Once again, a big thanks to the dev team :) > > Rhesa > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
-- Anand V. Avati
