Re: Slowness and segfault with 313

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just tested a full zimbra backup on my mailbox with 308 client and 313 bricks and it completed in normal time with no errors. This is more evidence that the problem is client only and was introduced in 309-313.

Harris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harris Landgarten" <harrisl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Harris Landgarten" <harrisl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 8:30:15 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Re: Slowness and segfault with 313

Some more testing:

Patch 308

time tar -cvf /mnt/glusterfs/test/test.tbz 0 1 2 3

real    6m47.947s
user    0m0.180s
sys     0m1.220s

Patch 313

time tar -cvf /mnt/glusterfs/test/test.tbz 0 1 2 3

real    9m21.909s
user    0m0.160s
sys     0m1.470s


Patch 313 also used 50% more memory.

This leads me to suspect the problem is in writebehind or posix-locks

Harris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harris Landgarten" <harrisl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 2:23:20 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Slowness and segfault with 313

Last weekend with 299 a full Zimbra backup completed in 27 minutes. This weekend with 313 the backup was only about 1/2 through after 5 hrs. I aborted the backup and the client crashed. The abort would have tried to remove about 4G of files from the /mnt/glusterfs/backups/tmp folder. The following BT was generated from the core:

Core was generated by `[glusterfs]                                                                   '.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  unify_unlink (frame=0xdec4b30, this=0x80585b0, loc=0xddb98dc) at unify.c:2256
2256      list = loc->inode->private;
(gdb) bt
#0  unify_unlink (frame=0xdec4b30, this=0x80585b0, loc=0xddb98dc) at unify.c:2256
#1  0xb7f32c66 in default_unlink (frame=0xdbc51f8, this=0x80592c0, loc=0xddb98dc) at defaults.c:480
#2  0xb7f32c66 in default_unlink (frame=0xde06ca8, this=0x8059350, loc=0xddb98dc) at defaults.c:480
#3  0x0804ccf3 in fuse_unlink (req=0xdf68980, par=4786914, name=0xcc16770 "BbZslzxnS2Y,8Az0m2v5ExLBXbs=6411-6246.msg1") at fuse-bridge.c:781
#4  0xb7f21461 in fuse_reply_err () from /usr/lib/libfuse.so.2
#5  0xb7f221e3 in fuse_reply_entry () from /usr/lib/libfuse.so.2
#6  0xb7f239c6 in fuse_session_process () from /usr/lib/libfuse.so.2
#7  0x0804abae in fuse_transport_notify (xl=0x8059910, event=2, data=0x8053410) at fuse-bridge.c:1942
#8  0xb7f34cc7 in transport_notify (this=0xddb98dc, event=204699600) at transport.c:152
#9  0xb7f35979 in sys_epoll_iteration (ctx=0xbfb56b14) at epoll.c:54
#10 0xb7f34d9d in poll_iteration (ctx=0xbfb56b14) at transport.c:260
#11 0x0804a29b in main (argc=5, argv=0xbfb56bf4) at glusterfs.c:348



_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel






[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux