Re: glusterfs process grows pretty large?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the work ;)

Is it safe to reboot that box? Wanna try 270 on it. Trying 270 on another similar setup with one brick of 5tb but memory is about 600megz, but the rsync is still running so Ill wait on a decision on that one. glusterfsd and glusterfs seem to start with 100megz each now. Is that expected?

Regards,
Dale

Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
Hi Dale,
Now with patch-270, memory leak should not be seen. A big thanks for giving access to your machine, as it was hard for me to replicate the same setup here.

-bulde

On 7/3/07, *Dale Dude* <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    Im running 3 rsyncs in parallel and glusterfs gets to about
    400megz. Is
    glusterfs supposed to grow so large? It seems to reduce memory
    (sometimes) when the rsync is done.

           CMD COUNT USER-TIME SYS-TIME MEM-TOTAL
    glusterfs     1     9m53s    2m32s 401.73 MiB
         rsync     4       11s      25s 337.90 MiB


    _______________________________________________
    Gluster-devel mailing list
    Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
    http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




--
Amar Tumballi
http://amar.80x25.org
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux