Thanks for the work ;)
Is it safe to reboot that box? Wanna try 270 on it. Trying 270 on
another similar setup with one brick of 5tb but memory is about 600megz,
but the rsync is still running so Ill wait on a decision on that one.
glusterfsd and glusterfs seem to start with 100megz each now. Is that
expected?
Regards,
Dale
Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
Hi Dale,
Now with patch-270, memory leak should not be seen. A big thanks for
giving access to your machine, as it was hard for me to replicate the
same setup here.
-bulde
On 7/3/07, *Dale Dude* <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Im running 3 rsyncs in parallel and glusterfs gets to about
400megz. Is
glusterfs supposed to grow so large? It seems to reduce memory
(sometimes) when the rsync is done.
CMD COUNT USER-TIME SYS-TIME MEM-TOTAL
glusterfs 1 9m53s 2m32s 401.73 MiB
rsync 4 11s 25s 337.90 MiB
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Amar Tumballi
http://amar.80x25.org
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
