I have no open issues at the moment. Everything is working with my application. Harris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anand Avati" <avati@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Harris Landgarten" <harrisl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2007 7:44:51 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York Subject: Re: Problem with namespace-cache in 2.5 Harris, this bug got fixed a while back. Are you still facing the same issue? thanks, avati 2007/6/22 , Harris Landgarten < harrisl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >: I am testing 2.5-patch-194. I have a two brick setup with ns setup as a second volume on the second brick. I am exporting /mnt/export on the bricks and /mnt/namespace on the ns volume All seems ok but the namespace cache is not filling completely. [root@domU- 12-31-35 - 00-36-41 :~] find /mnt/export/ -type d -ls | wc -l 3947 [root@domU- 12-31-35 - 00-36-41 :~] find /mnt/namespace/ -type d -ls | wc -l 103 This is causing read failures on the clients sudo find /mnt/glusterfs/secondary/ -type d -ls 4440068 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 harrisl harrisl 4096 Jun 22 10:33 /mnt/glusterfs/secondary/ 4440069 4 drwxr-xr-x 10 harrisl harrisl 4096 Jun 22 10:36 /mnt/glusterfs/secondary/0 4440160 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 harrisl harrisl 4096 Jun 22 10:36 /mnt/glusterfs/secondary/0/5 4440161 4 drwxr-xr-x 11 harrisl harrisl 4096 Jun 22 10:36 /mnt/glusterfs/secondary/0/5/msg 4440177 92 drwxr-xr-x 2 harrisl harrisl 90112 Jun 22 10:37 /mnt/glusterfs/secondary/0/5/msg/0 4440176 100 drwxr-xr-x 2 harrisl harrisl 98304 Jun 22 10:41 /mnt/glusterfs/secondary/0/5/msg/1 4440175 100 drwxr-xr-x 2 harrisl harrisl 98304 Jun 22 10:41 /mnt/glusterfs/secondary/0/5/msg/2 4440174 96 drwxr-xr-x 2 harrisl harrisl 94208 Jun 22 10:41 /mnt/glusterfs/secondary/0/5/msg/3 hangs 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [client-protocol.c:4499:notify] client-ns: got GF_EVENT_CHILD_UP 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [ client-protocol.c:4263:client_protocol_handshake_reply] client1: reply frame has callid: 424242 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [client-protocol.c:4297:client_protocol_handshake_reply] client1: SETVOLUME on remote-host succeeded 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [client-protocol.c:4263:client_protocol_handshake_reply] client2: reply frame has callid: 424242 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [client-protocol.c:4297:client_protocol_handshake_reply] client2: SETVOLUME on remote-host succeeded 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [client-protocol.c:4263:client_protocol_handshake_reply] client-ns: reply frame has callid: 424242 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [client-protocol.c:4297:client_protocol_handshake_reply] client-ns: SETVOLUME on remote-host succeeded 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:403:fuse_getattr] glusterfs-fuse: GETATTR 4440161 (/secondary/0/5/msg) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:316:fuse_lookup] glusterfs-fuse: LOOKUP 4440161 /3 (/secondary/0/5/msg/3) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [inode.c:478:__create_inode] client-ns/inode: create inode( 4440174 ) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [inode.c:278:__active_inode] client-ns/inode: activating inode( 4440174 ), lru=0/1000 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [ inode.c:478:__create_inode] bricks/inode: create inode( 4440174 ) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [inode.c:278:__active_inode] bricks/inode: activating inode( 4440174 ), lru=0/100 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [inode.c:478:__create_inode] client2/inode: create inode( 5521417 ) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [inode.c:278:__active_inode] client2/inode: activating inode( 5521417 ), lru=0/1000 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [inode.c:478:__create_inode] client1/inode: create inode( 5046281 ) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [ inode.c:278:__active_inode] client1/inode: activating inode( 5046281 ), lru=0/1000 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:267:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: ENTRY => 4440174 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [inode.c:478:__create_inode] fuse/inode: create inode( 4440174 ) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [inode.c:278:__active_inode] fuse/inode: activating inode( 4440174 ), lru=0/0 2007-06-22 11:17:07 W [client-protocol.c:3957:client_protocol_reconnect] client2: breaking reconnect chain 2007-06-22 11:17:07 W [ client-protocol.c:3957:client_protocol_reconnect] client-ns: breaking reconnect chain 2007-06-22 11:17:07 W [client-protocol.c:3957:client_protocol_reconnect] client1: breaking reconnect chain I am also getting this on direct reads on files on another client: 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:267:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: ENTRY => 4440161 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:316:fuse_lookup] glusterfs-fuse: LOOKUP 4440161 /5 (/secondary/0/5/msg/5) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:267:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: ENTRY => 4440161 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:316:fuse_lookup] glusterfs-fuse: LOOKUP 4440161 /2 (/secondary/0/5/msg/2) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [ fuse-bridge.c:267:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: ENTRY => 4440161 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:316:fuse_lookup] glusterfs-fuse: LOOKUP 4440161 /5 (/secondary/0/5/msg/5) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c :267:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: ENTRY => 4440161 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:316:fuse_lookup] glusterfs-fuse: LOOKUP 4440161 /5 (/secondary/0/5/msg/5) 2007-06-22 11:17:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:293:fuse_entry_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: ERR => -1 (2) 2007-06-22 11:17:49 D [fuse-bridge.c:316:fuse_lookup] glusterfs-fuse: LOOKUP 1/secondary (/secondary) 2007-06-22 11:18:07 D [fuse-bridge.c:316:fuse_lookup] glusterfs-fuse: LOOKUP 1/secondary (/secondary) _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- Anand V. Avati
