Can you please send your spec files? thanks, avati 2007/7/2, Brent A Nelson <brent@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Nope, all glusterfsd processess are still running after that. New copies from local filesystem to glusterfs work without complaint, but copies from the glusterfs to the glusterfs give that complaint for probably every file copied. Note that the copy appears to be successful, despite the complaint. Thanks, Brent On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Anand Avati wrote: > Brent, > Most likely this seems to be caused by a server crash. Can you confirm if > glusterfsd died while this operation was under way ('Invalid argument' was > wrongly returned which is now again fixed to 'Transport endpoint not > connected'). 'preserving ACL' internally means a setxattr() call. A setxattr > related bug was fixed in the server earlier today which likely caused the > server death, and hence 'invalid argument' reply. Now both should be fixed. > > thanks, > avati > > 2007/7/1, Brent A Nelson <brent@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> When doing a cp -a from a directory in a glusterfs to a different >> directory of the same glusterfs, I get messages such as the following >> (presumably for every file copied): >> >> cp: `usr/include/linux/atmppp.h': Invalid argument >> cp: preserving ACL for `usr0/include/linux/atmppp.h': Invalid argument >> >> This did not occur when copying the original directory from a local ext3 >> to the glusterfs. >> >> Is GlusterFS claiming to have ACL support when it doesn't? Or does it now >> have some support, and I should mount the underlying ext3 volumes with the >> acl option? Or...? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brent >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > > > -- > Anand V. Avati >
-- Anand V. Avati