On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:56:50AM +0200, Steffen Grunewald wrote: > BTW, is it just me feeling that GlusterFS is approaching ZFS in some way? For small-ish storage needs (what can be reasonably acheived by disks attached to the same physical machine), I guess GlusterFS provides much of the same functionality (and a bit more ;) as ZFS. Personally I think ZFS and GlusterFS make a killer combo. Have your servers use ZFS as the disk filesystem and run GlusterFS on top (once we port GlusterFS to Open Solaris ofcourse). Vikas (forgot to CC to mailing list)
