Re: Is something like this planned?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



AWESOME!

=D

On 6/4/07, Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the 'self heal' coming in for 1.3-STABLE solves exactly what you are
talking about.

thanks,
avati

2007/6/4, Brandon Lamb <brandonlamb@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Are there plans for a command to check the client config for AFR and
> make sure you actually have the right amount of copies for whatever
> the config specifies?
>
> So if i say *:2 copies and on a 3 server cluster 1 goes down for a
> day, now its likely i only have 1 copy of my files, when i bring back
> the 3rd server i will probalby only have 1 copies of those original
> files (in the case that the machine with the 2nd copy has its drive
> die).
>
> I guess it would be some kind of sync? I thought I read something like
> that in a roadmap on the glusterfs.org wiki but I wasnt sure if thats
> what it referred to or not.
>
> Otherwise I guess today you would have to do an rsync when you brought
> the downed server back into the cluster?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>


--
Anand V. Avati





[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux