Yep, i agree with krishna, AFR is not visible to usr. It should happen in background, so why the user should be aware of all the 3 or 2 replicated copies? For a user, if he writes 1MB, he wants to see 1MB as used space. So, showing the sizeof the first server is better idea. (or even size of smallest is good too). -bulde On 6/4/07, Krishna Srinivas <krishna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/4/07, Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (fwd'ing to gluster-devel) > > > > > Maybe it could give a sum-up of each "replica"-bricks ? > > this makes sense too, where you show the total storage as X, which > gets 'consumed' much faster (as in, when you add a 1MB file, 2 or 3 MB > gets counted for 'used' according to the replication count) No, I think this might confuse the users. I think showing the info of the first server will be good because of the reasons mentioned by you in the previous mail. Lets see if we can come up with an ideal solution. Krishna > > any opinions? > > > -- > Anand V. Avati > > > -- > Anand V. Avati > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
-- Amar Tumballi http://amar.80x25.org [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
