Brent,
this is a valuable observation. my initial suspicion is that NFS's
open+write+close for every write (to be stateless) causes seperate FDs
created for each write chunk, which are ending in sepearte I/O
threads. I/O threads currently allots fd's to threads in a
'least-used-at-the-moment' policy. changing this to an inode number
basedd static policy might help.
thanks again for the observation!
regards,
avati
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:06:17PM -0400, Brent A Nelson wrote:
> Hmm, it looks like io-threads is responsible for more than just mtime
> glitches when used with write-behind. I just found that the problems I
> had with NFS re-export go away when I get rid of io-threads (plus, now
> that I can enable write-behind, the NFS write performance is far better,
> by at least a factor of 5)!
>
> It looks like I'll be switching off io-threads for now, and turning on all
> the other performance enhancements.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brent
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Brent A Nelson wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Anand Avati wrote:
> >
> >>Brent,
> >>I understand what is happening. It is because I/O threads lets the
> >>mtime overtake the write call. I assume you have loaded io-threads on
> >>server side (or below write-behind on client side).
> >
> >Yes, I have io-threads loaded on the server. This occurs when I load
> >write-behind on the client.
> >
> >>I could provide you a temporary 'ugly' fix just for you if the issue is
> >>critical (until the proper framework comes in 1.4)
> >
> >It would be worthwhile if the temporary fix is acceptable for the 1.3
> >release (otherwise, you'll need a warning included with the release, so
> >that people enabling io-threads and write-behind know what to expect), but
> >don't waste your time if it's just for me. Push on to 1.4 and the real
> >fix; I'll just leave write-behind disabled for now.
> >
> >Many Thanks,
> >
> >Brent
> >
>
--
ultimate_answer_t
deep_thought (void)
{
sleep (years2secs (7500000));
return 42;
}
