Re: Is lock (fcntl) supported by multilple concurent client ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



gpvcs@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
In my configuration I noticed that locks are sticky. I dont
know why but I found this behaviour:
- first client open file, lock it (fcntl) and write to it
and close it OK
- second client open file, try to lock it and wait (fcntl
SETLKW), obtain the lock, write to it and close it OK
- first client open file, try to lock it and wait FOREVER
(fcntl SETLW) KO!
- second client open file, try to lock it and wait FOREVER
(fcntl SETLW) KO!

In fact it looks like that lock obtain by SETLKW are never
released.
On the other hand, locks obtain by GETLW/SETLK are released.
I know you are busy working on the lock code. Do you see any
reason for this behaviour ?
This was a bug in the locking code. The fix is in the tla repo now.

Also, POSIX locking support has been moved into a separate translator now (features/posix-locks). This will give us locking support over other storage backends as well (for example Amazon S3).

Typically you'd want to load it on the server side, just above the storage xlator.

volume locks
 type features/posix-locks
 subvolumes brick
end-volume

HTH,
Vikas




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux