Re: Memory leak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Anand Avati wrote:

Brent,
 glusterfs (client) memory usage increase with metadata operations is
expected, it should drop after some idletime (after the kernel wishes
to forget the correspending inodes),

I thought that could be, but I'm not sure. I left the filesystem idle all night, and I still have (from "ps auxww"): root 3047 4.7 16.7 674668 673444 ? Ss Mar07 49:26 [glusterfsd] root 3068 4.9 2.5 103072 101584 ? Ss Mar07 51:29 [glusterfs]

though the glusterfsd increase looks suspicious.

Agreed.

By the way, have you been trying io-threads on server or client or both?

Well, I didn't know I could even do a performance translator on the server (glusterfsd)! All my performance translator tests are with the client spec only. My server specs only contain storage/posix and protocol/server. Client and server both are running on the same node(s).

Are performance translators recommended/required for both client and server processes? Can you do the cluster translators on the server-side, too?

Thanks for the notice. (we are looking into read-ahead fixes currently)

Cool beans.

Thanks,

Brent




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux