Re: Performance issue: initial git clone causes massive repack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 03:07:43PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:

> Our full repository conversion is large, even after tuning the
> repacking, the packed repository is between 1.4 and 1.6GiB. As of Feburary
> 4th, 2009, it contained 4886949 objects. It is not suitable for
> splitting into submodules either unfortunately - we have a lot of
> directory moves that would cause submodule bloat.

Actually, I'm not sure that a full portage tree repository would be the
best thing to do. It would not be suitable in the long term and working
on the repository/history would be a big mess. Why provide a such repo ?
Or at least, why provide a such readable repo ?

IMHO, you should provide a repository per upstream package on the main
server.


PS: what about cc'ing gentoo-scm list ?

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux