> > Hi, > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Marius Storm-Olsen wrote: > >> The standard allocator on Windows is pretty bad prior to Windows Vista, >> and nedmalloc is better than the modified dlmalloc provided with newer >> versions of the MinGW libc. >> >> Note that both Windows and MacOSX need to have an implementation of >> strdup, which I added at the end of nedmalloc.c, to ensure that strdup >> use the same heap. So, setting USE_NED_ALLOCATION = YesPlease will also >> add this function reimplementation, unless you define >> NEDMALLOC_DONT_OVERRIDE_STRDUP. >> >> NedMalloc stats in Git >> ---------------------- >> All results are the best result out of 3 runs. The >> benchmarks have been done on different hardware, so >> the repack times are not comparable. >> >> These benchmarks are all based on 'git repack -adf' >> on the Linux kernel. >> >> XP >> ----------------------------------------------- >> MinGW Threads Total Time Speed >> ----------------------------------------------- >> 3.4.2 (1T) 00:12:28.422 >> 3.4.2 + nedmalloc (1T) 00:07:25.437 1.68x >> >> 3.4.5 (1T) 00:12:20.718 >> 3.4.5 + nedmalloc (1T) 00:07:24.809 1.67x >> >> 4.3.3-tdm (1T) 00:12:01.843 >> 4.3.3-tdm + nedmalloc (1T) 00:07:16.468 1.65x >> >> 4.3.3-tdm (2T) 00:07:35.062 >> 4.3.3-tdm + nedmalloc (2T) 00:04:57.874 1.54x > > Wow! That is impressive. indeed, haven't time to test it myself currently tho :-( i hope someone can confirm this massive performance boost and that this patch makes it into msysgit very soon. thanks for the work :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
