[PATCHv2 1/2] Test for local branches being followed with --track

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



According to the documentation, it is perfectly okay to follow local
branches using the --track option. Introduce a test which checks whether
they behave the same. Currently 1 test fails.

Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 t/t6040-tracking-info.sh |   10 +++++++++-
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t6040-tracking-info.sh b/t/t6040-tracking-info.sh
index ba90601..2a2b6b6 100755
--- a/t/t6040-tracking-info.sh
+++ b/t/t6040-tracking-info.sh
@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ test_expect_success setup '
 		git checkout -b b4 origin &&
 		advance e &&
 		advance f
-	)
+	) &&
+	git checkout -b follower --track master &&
+	advance g
 '
 
 script='s/^..\(b.\)[	 0-9a-f]*\[\([^]]*\)\].*/\1 \2/p'
@@ -56,6 +58,12 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout' '
 	grep "have 1 and 1 different" actual
 '
 
+test_expect_failure 'checkout with local tracked branch' '
+	git checkout master &&
+	git checkout follower >actual
+	grep "is ahead of" actual
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'status' '
 	(
 		cd test &&
-- 
1.6.2.1.507.g0e68d

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux