Re: [PATCH] builtin-clone.c: fix memory leak in cmd_clone()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ali Gholami Rudi <ali@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
>> 
>> > With this patch, cmd_clone() safely frees its xstrdup()-allocated
>> > memory.  Also junk_work_tree and junk_git_dir (used in remove_junk()
>> > which is called asynchronously) were changed to use static arrays rather
>> > than sharing the memory allocated in cmd_clone().
>> 
>> If you want to go down that route, you will have a long way to go: the 
>> assumption is pretty much in every cmd_() and main() function that 
>> singletons will be free()d automatically when the process ends.
>
> Well... I saw strbuf_release() calls in the end of cmd_clone() and had a
> quick look at a few other cmd_*() functions; it seems most of them (?)
> try to free their memory.  I thought it might make sense to do that for
> cmd_clone().  But you're right; they will be freed eventually.  (It
> seems like a minor leak which is respected only some of the times :-) )

Yup, I'll queue (I won't have time today to work on git it seems) the
other two patches from you, but I was going to drop this one---unless your
plan was to make cmd_clone() callable more than once in order to use it in
say a C rewrite of git submodule or something like that.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux