Re: On git 1.6 (novice's opinion)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ulrich Windl wrote:
On 30 Mar 2009 at 11:06, Andreas Ericsson wrote:

[...]
3 It's far better to set the version number in the release-process. Usually
  this can be done automatically by one invocation of "git describe", just
  as git.git does it.

However if you put a version number into every file and THEN commit, it's somewhat ridiculous (I'll have to learn about "git describe"). But for configuration management you want to have exactly that (find exactly the file that was shipped (or used to build)).

We've adopted "3" full out at $dayjob. Our build-machinery gets the version
number from the git tag (releases can only be built from signed tags), and
it updates macros and whatnot used for informing the user which version he
or she is running. This makes a lot more sense both from a bug-reporting
and from a release process view than having generated version-numbers in

So your "release commits" are outside GIT? (see above)


They aren't release commits. Just a script that creates a tarball and an RPM
(in our case).

files. On a side-note; When I told my co-workers I'd like us to switch to
git, two of them asked about autoversioning features. I said there weren't
any and asked them to name a single time when we've actually used them for
anything *at all*. In a team of eight, having been programming for three
years with 12 releases and about 800 bugreports + feature-requests, noone
could mention a single time when the autogenerated version numbers had
actually been used for anything.

Hmm: Were they visible to customers?


Ofcourse they were, but they were rather useless even there, as a customer
could upgrade and the $Id$ tag still wouldn't get updated. It caused a lot
of confusion for our not-so-techsavvy users and customers.

Otoh, having the entire repository locally makes it painless to view the
commit-log for an entire project (or parts of it) and see who changed what
when and why, which is information that's actually *useful*.

[Big meals need time to digest: Just give me more time to do so (getting into git). As with vi and Emacs (usualy I prefer Emacs), there will be situations when I won't use Git however]


Take all the time you need. It's a paradigm-shift, because the information you
thought you needed is made obsolete by the information you *actually* need.
Wrapping ones head around the fact that one's been wrong for several years takes
a little time ;-)

--
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux