Re: bsd group semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:32:14AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> My point was if I belong only to my personal group and git.git work tree
>> is owned by junio.junio to begin with, you would never be able to notice
>> any breakage with such a test.
>
> Ah, I see. Yes, you would need to belong to at least two groups to make
> such a test feasible.
>
> Such a requirement is generally outside the scope of running the
> test suite; do you want to just ditch the g+s test, then, or do you want
> me to work up something conditional based on the Makefile flag?

For now, I'd suggest teaching the test not to care about g+s bit.
After all, they are about giving correct mode bits to files and
directories.  Correct mode bits for group do not mean anything if you make
them owned by a wrong group, but that is not something we have tested so
far, and can be a separate test anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux