Hi, On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Finn Arne Gangstad wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:10:04AM +0100, Santi Béjar wrote: > > push.default was too generic, and also didn't specify if it was about > > remote, refspec, branches, behaviour... > > [...] > > "You can specify what action you want to take in this case, and", > > - "avoid seeing this message again, by configuring 'push.default' to:", > > + "avoid seeing this message again, by configuring 'push.style' to:", > > " 'nothing' : Do not push anything", > > " 'matching' : Push all matching branches (default)", > > " 'tracking' : Push the current branch to whatever it is tracking", > > [...] > > I don't think "push.style" is an improvement. "style" sounds like it > affects all pushes. This configuration variable says what push should do > when no refspec is given and none are configured, so the word "default" > should be in there at least. Maybe "defaultref" would have been better? I'd prefer "push.defaultMode", but... > Some people may have started setting push.default already, so changing > the name may cause additional grief. ... indeed, it is too late now. The milk has boiled already. Ciao, Dscho
