Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> OK, I see now that the previous patch-series has been merged to "pu".
> Is there a reason why this updated patch-series hasn't superseded it?
Even if the tested program crashes, it is Ok to test them inside
expect_failure, so I'd suggest not commenting the first two out.
But running the tests with the first patch applied to the same base as
where v1 was applied gives this, which is a more serious issue:
$ sh t9301-fast-export.sh 2>&1 | tail -n 2
* still have 4 known breakage(s)
* failed 6 among remaining 15 test(s)
In other words, the changes to the set-up part seem to break unrelated
tests. Why can such an update supersede the previous one?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
