Re: [PATCH] Two RPM building improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 27.03.2009 17:20:
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> Niels Basjes <Niels@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Two RPM building improvements:
>>
>> Two _unrelated_ RPM building improvements squashed in one commit.
>>
>>>   - Building the RPMs can now be done by a non-root user.
>>
>> It was always possible, you only have to configure rpm / rpmbuild,
>> namely put path to where you want your RPM_BUILDING directory in
>> ~/.rpmmacros as %_topdir, for example:
>>
>>   $ cat ~/.rpmmacros
>>   %_topdir        /home/local/builddir
>>
>> Please RTFM first, before going to solve non-problem in (ugh) fairly
>> complicated way.
> 
> That might be a bit too harsh to somebody who genuinely wished to share
> his improvement with others.
> 
> Being RPM novice, the first thing I asked around immediately after taking
> the maintainership over was the ~/.rpmmacros trick.  We really should
> mention it in _our_ documentation, even just a sentence or two would be
> sufficient.

I assumed everyone building rpms would use rpmdev-setuptree from
rpmdevtools, but apparently not ;) I'm not sure whether non-Redhat
rpm-based distros have that, though.

I'm wondering a bit about the all-rpms target. How does this work
without mock? All build requirements installed for all platforms?? I
think it really calls for a mock build/vm (unless i386 on x86_64).

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux