On 27 Mar 2009 at 15:24, Dmitry Potapov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Ulrich Windl > <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > what made me wonder is this (about item 1): I thought I've read that blobs store > > content and attributes, so very obviously I wondered why not store thr "right > > attributes" (i.e. the time of the file). My reasoning: You make some changes, then > > test them (which might last several hours or days). The if I'm happy I'll > > "commit". > > With Git, you usually commit your changes immediately (without waiting > the result > of testing), because you can always undo commit until you publish your changes. Hi! AFAIK, "committing" in git is "kind of publishing your work" (others may pull it). I don't like publishing my mistakes ;-) Even if no-one pulls the commit, your "undo" refers to "committing a fix for the last committed mistake", right? Again, I don't really want to document/archive (i.e. commit) my mistake. Or did I miss something here? I know: Other's opinions are quite different on these issues. Regards, Ulrich -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
