Re: [PATCH 01/10] refs: add "for_each_bisect_ref" function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le vendredi 27 mars 2009, Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Christian Couder wrote:
> > Le jeudi 26 mars 2009, Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > > > Christian Couder venit, vidit, dixit 26.03.2009 08:48:
> > > > > Le jeudi 26 mars 2009, Sverre Rabbelier a écrit :
> > > > >> A 10 patches series with no cover letter?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not a big fan of cover letters. Usually I prefer adding
> > > > > comments in the patches.
> > > >
> > > > I'm sorry I have to say that, but your individual preferences don't
> > > > matter. Many of us would do things differently, each in their own
> > > > way, but people adjust to the list's preferences. It's a matter of
> > > > attitude. So, please...
> > >
> > > Actually, a better way to ask for a cover letter would have been to
> > > convince Christian.  So I'll try that.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > As you know, I have been sending patches since nearly 3 years ago to
> > this list. And it's only since a few weeks ago that I am asked to send
> > cover letters...
>
> Heh, I have the feeling that your patch series were much shorter, and did
> not have many revisions, until a few weeks ago ;-)

Please try to look for a 9 patch long series that you reviewed around 
october 2007 with "dunno" or "skip" in the title ;-)

> > > From the patch series' titles (especially when they are cropped due
> > > to the text window being too small to fit the indented thread), it is
> > > not all that obvious what you want to achieve with those 10 patches.
> > >
> > > From recent discussions, I seem to remember that you wanted to have
> > > some cute way to mark commits as non-testable during a bisect, and I
> > > further seem to remember that Junio said that very method should be
> > > usable outside of bisect, too.
> >
> > Well, we want to move "git bisect skip" code from shell (in
> > "git-bisect.sh") to C. So this patch series does that by creating a new
> > "git bisect--helper" command in C that contains the new code and using
> > that new command in "git-bisect.sh".
>
> Oh?  I _completely_ missed that.  And that's being one of the original
> Cc:ed persons...
>
> > > Unfortunately, that does not reveal to me, quickly, what is the
> > > current state of affairs, and what you changed since the last time.
> >
> > Yeah, I should have at least put something in the comment section of my
> > first patch in this series.
>
> No.  I would still have missed it.
>
> The cover letter is outside of any patch, because it describes the
> purpose of the _whole_ patch series, not just one patch.
>
> So, it would have been nice to get a heads-up that this is not your
> bisect-skip-a-whole-bunch-of-commits series, but a new animal.
>
> This way, I decided I do not have time for something I do not need, and
> deleted it without having a look.

Well as I said in my previous email I am willing to improve. So perhaps next 
time.

Best regards,
Christian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux