Nanako Shiraishi wrote: > Quoting rocketraman@xxxxxxxxxxx: > >> + - The 'maint' branch is updated to the new release. >> + >> + $ git checkout maint >> + $ git merge master >> + >> + This is equivalent to deleting maint and recreating it from >> + master, but it preserves the maint reflog. > > After giving a recipe that is better than an alternative, what's > the point of describing an inferior alternative as "equivalent", > when it is obviously not "equivalent"? Is this better: The resulting maint tree is equivalent to deleting maint and recreating it from the tip of master, but merging from master preserves the maint reflog. Cheers, Raman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
