Hi, I search a way to track commits in function of their aim. I tried to use branches (test, debugger, etc). For example if I search the commits related to tests, I can search all commits what are in branch test and not in branch debugger, but it's boring (I need to exclude all other branches than test) Moreover, if I remove a branch, it will complicate the search. In addition, branches are a way to specify streams, not a way to specify an aim for a commit. (like in ruby a class is a method container, not a type) So branch names are often like next, pu, dev, test, stupid-idea, etc. They are totally useless for tracking aims. The method used in every repositories I looked into is to use the "aim: subject" form in their commit messages. So search all commits related to a specific aim is equivalent to grep "my-aim:" in commit messages. The problem is that this method is not used in all commits ("aim - subject" or just "subject" are used too), so I can't assume to find all commits with a such method... And if a search a more generic form ("test"), I might find useless commits that will pollute my results... The last method I can find, is to use tags. But, as CVS and many others do, tags are unique. It is usefull for tagging a software version number, but not for tracking. So, we have branches, which are not stable, tags, which are unique, and commit messages, which are not normalized. What can we do ? In my mind, the good ways are to improve the commit message way, or, better, to change the current tag concept. One improvement could be to add a mechanism similar to "signed-off-by:" message: add an option in git-commit to facilitate the creation of "tags" and make sure these "tags" will be normalized... example: `git commit -t test,debugger -m "add test for debugger"` this will create a commit and add automatically "test: debugger:" at begin or "tags: test, debugger" at end of the message (like the "signed-off-by: xxx" lines) It's not really better this current solution, but it's a first step to normalization. There is still a big problem with this solution : this tags are immutable, as they are stored inside the commit. An other improvement would be to create new version of tags. `git tag v1.6.3` would create a unique tag, and `git tag --no-unique test` would create a simple tag. (until we can change the default) The -t option of git-commit is still possible, but it will call the new git-tag. Note: Theses tags may be treated like refs (git log fault-tolerance), but they can't be stored in $GIT_DIR/refs directory, as they reference a list a commits... So, I see 2 solutions: - Normalize the way to write tags but keep them into commit message: (-) There will be 2 sorts of tags: static immutable and dynamic unique (+) This way is totally retro-compatible - Change the tags concept: (-) Need to change the tag object format (ouch) (+) More powerful Maybe I have missed a better tool to do my job ? Or there is a better improvement which is more simple ? Best regards, Etienne Vallette d'Osia ps: I'm really sorry if my message is full of English errors... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html