Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Adam Heath wrote: > >> Sam Hocevar wrote: >>> In your particular case, I would suggest setting pack.packSizeLimit >>> to something lower. This would reduce the time spent generating a new >>> pack file if the problem were to happen again. >> Yeah, saw that one, but *after* I had this problem. The default, if >> not set, is unlimited, which in this case, is definately *not* what we >> want. > > In your particular case, if the problem is actually what I think it is, > the pack.packSizeLimit wouldn't have made any difference. This setting > affects local repacking only and has no effect what so ever on the push > operation. Ooh. Care to enlighten those of us not blessed with git internal knowledge? On another note, anyone have a goat I can buy, for the sacrifice? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
