Thomas Coppi <thisnukes4u@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> You could do both. ??But I think most people on the list will argue >> that doing both is overkill and only one is necessary, and further, >> that only the one that offers the "biggest bank for the buck" >> should be implemented. > > Alright, that seems reasonable. Given that I think I would lean > towards implementing an object list caching mechanism, since that seems > to be more generally applicable. The logic for this would then need to > be in the rev-list code(as mentioned in the JGit discussion), correct? Probably. IIRC upload-pack forks a rev-list to produce the object list, and pipes that into the forked pack-objects' stdin. Thus rev-list is probably what would need to know how to include the cached list to its output. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
