Re: [PATCH/RFD] builtin-revert.c: release index lock when cherry-picking an empty commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 02:58:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Junio, do you want to put anything in the release notes warning people
> > who build from source that this is a potential issue? Do you want
> > something in the Makefile detecting that the shell is broken?
> 
> A sentence or two in INSTALL will not hurt.
> 
> I would not worry too much about the test scripts, but I would worry more
> about getting phantom bug reports for our shell script Porcelains that get
> hit by this.  Earlier I mentioned bisect is the only heavy user, but the
> issue is more severe with filter-branch that is designed to eval end user
> scripts (calls to 'eval "$filter_frotz"' check the exit status and die on
> failure---with trailing blank lines the failure the filter reports will
> not get caught).

Agreed. The good news is that the /bin/sh people are treating it like a
bug:

  http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards/2009-March/001721.html

so it will hopefully be fixed soon. It might still be worth warning
users of older releases in INSTALL, though.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux